Kaley Cuoco is going through criticism after sharing the “heartbreaking resolution” she made to rehome her beloved canine.
On Monday, Cuoco addressed the scenario on social media, explaining her causes for rehoming the pet whereas saying the canine’s demise.
“Most of you already know I had [Shirley] for a lot of, many, a few years,” Cuoco started in a video uploaded to Instagram.
“Hastily, you sort of stopped seeing her, and I began to get lots of questions as to the place she was, as a result of it’s totally not like me to only cease posting a couple of canine that I’ve had since she was 6 weeks previous,” she continued.
Kaley Cuoco elaborated that her resolution to rehome her canine, Shirley, was pushed by “intense conflicts” along with her fiance Tom Pelphrey’s canine, Blue.
“Shirley was very particular to me, as you all know,” Cuoco shared. “When the love of my life, Tom- an enormous canine lover-moved throughout the nation along with his lovely German Shepherd, Blue, issues received difficult. Sadly, a few years in the past, Blue and Shirley began moving into main fights.”
The Massive Bang Principle star revealed that Shirley turned “decided to hurt” Blue, and the scenario solely escalated. “I cherished her deeply, however I used to be genuinely afraid. I did not need one thing horrible to occur or for somebody to get harm by chance,” Cuoco mentioned.
Finally, she rehomed Shirley along with her pet handler, Tony, and his spouse, Angie, who had been serving to take care of her. “They cherished her so, a lot, and it was an excruciating resolution,” she defined.
Cuoco then shared that Shirley not too long ago died from “a really aggressive bone most cancers.” By means of tears, she added, “She was virtually 14 years previous, which is an unimaginable life for a canine. I simply needed to share her story and what we needed to do.”
Following her revelation, Cuoco confronted backlash from followers on social media, with many expressing disappointment over her resolution to rehome the canine.
A consumer wrote, “I believed she was an advocate for deserted canine?”
One other consumer commented, “There’s not a shot in hell I’d give away my canine for any bf. Poor Shirley was by no means thought-about household; she was only a disposable animal!”
The third consumer wrote, “Sooner or later he’ll be out her life and she or he’s going to remorse that she made that alternative”
The fourth consumer requested, “Why did not the boyfriend hand over his canine? Why did not they put each canine by a coaching/ behavioural program?”
“I am completely disgusted,” the fifth consumer commented.