A federal choose in Washington, D.C., briefly blocked President Donald Trump’s current govt order aimed toward Susman Godfrey, the regulation agency that has for years represented Dominion Voting Methods — the main provider of election expertise throughout the U.S.
The choice from Choose Loren AliKhan on Tuesday is the most recent win for one of many few regulation corporations which have fought again in opposition to Trump’s orders as an alternative of hanging a deal.
Trump’s govt order seeks to dam the agency’s entry to authorities buildings and cancel authorities contracts, amongst others, over their “earlier actions.”
Susman Godfrey has represented the voting machine firm Dominion, famously securing a $787.5 million settlement from Fox Information to settle allegations the community aired false claims concerning the firm rigging the 2020 election.
President Donald Trump speaks as he meets with President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador within the Oval Workplace of the White Home, April 14, 2025 in Washington.
Win McNamee/Getty Photographs
Notably, the agency nonetheless represents Dominion in its lively instances in opposition to various Trump’s allies — together with Rudy Giuliani, Mike Lindell and others.
In her ruling, Choose AliKhan delivered a robust repudiation of the order, noting it “chills the agency’s speech and advocacy” in addition to “threatens reputational hurt.”
“The chief order relies on a private vendetta… and admittedly I feel the Framers of the Structure would see this as a stunning abuse of energy,” she stated.
Throughout the listening to on Tuesday afternoon, attorneys representing Susman Godfrey stated that Trump’s order was “probably the most overtly unconstitutional workout routines of govt energy within the historical past of this nation.”
Residents vote at a polling place contained in the Heritage Oaks condo houses, on April 1, 2025, in Madison, Wisconsin.
Scott Olson/Getty Photographs
“The chief is wielding an axe, and we don’t know precisely when that axe goes to fall however they’re able to carry it down,” stated Donald Verrilli, an legal professional representing Susman from the agency Munger, Tolles, and Olson.
Deputy Affiliate Legal professional Common Richard Lawson, a political appointee who beforehand labored for Legal professional Common Pam Bondi, argued repeatedly that the order match squarely within the administration’s free speech rights.
“I might urge nice warning from the courtroom on the judiciary policing the manager department’s speech, that’s only a very tough space that’s extraordinarily tough to try to implement,” Lawson stated.
He argued the choose ought to wait till the administration issued formal steerage to businesses on their interactions with the agency earlier than issuing a brief restraining order barring any form of enforcement.
Regardless of this, Choose AliKhan stated the TRO would stay in impact for 14 days and ordered the federal government to rescind any memos or steerage that had already gone out on the order.
The listening to comes because the Trump administration has ramped up stress in opposition to a number of regulation corporations and universities.
Since Trump started concentrating on regulation corporations, 9 of the nation’s largest regulation corporations — together with Paul Weiss, Kirkland & Ellis, Willkie Farr and Latham & Watkins — have agreed to offer a mixed $940 million in authorized providers to advertise causes supported by the president.
The corporations additionally agreed to take away Variety, Fairness and Inclusion from hiring practices and vow to not deny representing shoppers based mostly on politics.
Alternatively, three different main U.S. corporations — Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, and Jenner & Block — are combating the president’s motion in opposition to regulation corporations in federal courts, which have briefly paused the orders from taking impact.