Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth apologized after referring to People who voted for President-elect Donald Trump because the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted” group and “f—ing fascists.”
Helmuth got here beneath fireplace final week for blasting Trump supporters after his landslide victory over Vice President Kamala Harris, who was endorsed by Scientific American. As Trump pulled forward on election day, Helmuth repeatedly attacked his supporters on Bluesky, a social media platform that’s fashionable with liberals.
“Each 4 years I bear in mind why I left Indiana (the place I grew up) and bear in mind why I respect the individuals who stayed and are attempting to make it much less racist and sexist. The ethical arc of the universe is not going to bend itself,” she wrote.
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN EDITOR BLASTS ‘F—ING FASCISTS’ WHO ELECTED DONALD TRUMP
The editor of Scientific American isn’t any fan of President-elect Donald Trump. (AP Picture/Evan Vucci)
“Solidarity to everyone whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early outcomes as a result of f— them to the moon and again,” Helmuth additionally wrote, whereas one other put up stated, “I apologize to youthful voters that my Gen X is so stuffed with f—ing fascists.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
Helmuth was criticized for her feedback and X proprietor Elon Musk agreed with a person who stated she appeared “like a political activist who has taken over a scientific establishment.”
Helmuth ultimately apologized and deleted the feedback.
DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONSULTANT WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP SAYS LIBERAL FRIENDS TURNED THEIR BACK ON HER
Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth apologized after referring to People who voted for President-elect Donald Trump because the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted” group and “f—ing fascists.”
“I made a sequence of offensive and inappropriate posts on my private Bluesky account on election night time, and I’m sorry,” Helmuth wrote in an announcement on Bluesky.
“I respect and worth individuals throughout the political spectrum. These posts, which I’ve deleted, don’t replicate my beliefs; they had been a mistaken expression of shock and confusion concerning the election outcomes,” she continued. “These posts in fact don’t replicate the place of Scientific American or my colleagues. I’m dedicated to civil communication and editorial objectivity.”
Scientific American, which was based in 1845, payments itself as “the oldest repeatedly printed journal in america” and touts that it has run articles by greater than 200 Nobel Prize winners.
LIFELONG DEM, WHO VOTED TRUMP, CLASHES WITH CBS REPORTER ON THE STATE OF THE BIDEN ECONOMY
Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth referred to members of her technology as “f—ing fascists.” (Bluesky screenshot)
Scientific American didn’t instantly reply when requested for extra remark.
Father or mother firm and writer Springer Nature didn’t instantly reply when requested if it stands by Helmuth.
Following the election, Helmuth additionally shared a Scientific American article titled, “Election Grief Is Actual. Right here’s Tips on how to Cope,” which featured feedback from College of Minnesota emeritus professor and psychotherapist Pauline Boss.
Helmuth was beforehand a well being and science editor on the Washington Submit.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox Information Digital’s Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report.